He talks about issues in between his work on resolving issues. Twatson talks about issues and then talks about how she talks about talking about issues. It's all fine and well and to talk about issues. It's not doing nothing per se, but it's also not doing the work.This is what I said about a key difference between Twatson and Dear Dick. I'm not claiming to be psychic or anything, but I do think I'm a fairly decent judge of character. Anyway, here's what Twatson had to say about daycare in her post TAM write-up.
Richard Dawkins didn’t come on the SGU to chat, or talk to me at all, or mention the big to-do at all, but he did say he’d give money to set up childcare at future conferences.* This is great news! We’ve been pestering organizations to do this for years, specifically trying to get Camp Quest to work with the JREF to offer a mini-TAM for kids. I even mentioned it at Skepticon back in 2009 to an enthusiastic response. But, we’ve always lacked the money and the manpower to force the issue. So, win!
Yup. Dawkins was doing the work. And now she's talking about how she's talked about it. Ok, I think I have her number down pat (got it from a truckstop bathroom). I love the last bit there - they've lacked the money and manpower to force the issue. So, win!
Is it me or is she claiming victory that the atheist relic of yesteryear took care of? Like her talking about it is what got it done? And lacked the money? *quick search* I don't see her attempting to raise a single dollar to get the ball rolling.
Say, isn't skepchick an "organization"? Isn't SGU an organization? So, she even pesters herself? And still can't get shit done? I'm not surprised Dear Dick didn't have a sit down with her (for one, she was in a bar boycotting him, and for two, that involves beverages. I think we all know the outcome of trying to offer her a beverage.)
Again. Dawkins does shit and then talks to people for a little while. Twatson talks about some shit and then talks about how she's previously talked about some shit.