Wednesday, October 3, 2012

May It Please the Court

Dear Judge Lori B. Jackson:

     If it please the court, your honor, I should like to take a moment of the court's time to discuss an issue involving your honor's incompetence, if it's all the same to you. You see, judge, you are at present the jurist presiding over a divorce case involving one Mr. James Kirk, and one Mrs. Tina Kirk who, as your honor will know, have two minor children. As you will also know in regards this case, the court has been presented with a guardian ad litem report (hereinafter 'the report') recommending that said minor children, whose names I shall not mention, should be placed in the care of their father rather than their mother as a consequence of their mother's ill-controlled alcoholism and general mental illness. Also present in the report is a documented history of abusive conduct on the part of the mother as directed towards these minor children.

     These reports are fairly common in your line of work, and would in the course of a normal case not rise to level of being remarkable beyond the parties directly involved (i.e., yourself, the parents, their lawyers, and various government officials otherwise bound up in dealing with this particular case); however, the instant case has a few peculiarities which attendance has drawn my attention. I, of course, refer to your decision to place the minor children in the custody of their mentally ill, abusive and alcoholic mother rather than their father, and in disregard of the report indicating that the mother is unsuited at present to properly care for the children in addition to her being abusive against them. Further compounding matters is the fact that the publicly available report has found its way to a website whereat a copy, which redacts the name of the children, has been posted to bring to the attention of the public-at-large your decision.

     The guardian ad litem has filed an injunction request with the court to enjoin both Mr. Kirk and avoiceformen from posting said report, and to order the latter to remove from its website the redacted copy of the public report because the report, it is alleged, does not serve the best interests of the children. Presumably, if the best interests of the children are served by your placing these children in the care of a drunken, mentally ill parent who has a documented history of abusing her children, then people discussing the fact that you have put these children at physical risk of being harmed must serve their best interests, for stopping someone from being, oh, say, beaten is an issue more pressing than someone discussing the fact that someone has been beaten, and you clearly have ruled that being beaten is in a child's best interest.

     As noted in the guardian ad litem's motion now pending before the court notes, said motion was served on the attorney of record who is representing Mr. Kirk in the case now before your court. In an order for a hearing on this motion which you had entered into the record on September 28, I can't help but notice that Mr. Kirk's attorney's name appears on page two just above your signature. I also cannot help but to notice that you have dutifully lined through the attorney's name and appended to page one of this order a handwritten note which you've initialed indicating that the order should be served on Mr. Kirk directly for he is, on your telling, not represented by an attorney. What is more is that I cannot find (a), a note indicating that his attorney no longer represents him, or (b) that Mr. Kirk has informed the court that he wishes to proceed without an attorney.

     And as a peculiar aside to all of this, judge, I notice that I am not subject to the jurisdiction of your court, and even if I were, I am not a named party in the motion, so your order enjoining any of the named parties from publishing this document wouldn't apply to me in any event. Thus, in an effort to educate you in the ways of the internet; viz., the Streisand Effect, should you actually sign an order enjoining said parties from hosting or publishing this document, I shall immediately upload said document and host said document for the public, as their interest might dictate, might view it at their convenience. During the intervening period of time, I shall only link to it on the avoiceformen website.

Best Regards,
Somewhere Your Writ Won't Run


Paul Elam said...

:) ) ) )

bubbly said...

Here too superstar. I asked you to provide evidence for you claim that the "atheist movement" is "hundred" of years old. But you're too much of a superstar to provide evidence.

Anonymous said...

vdtvw jytfqdwyxgvpalrvxlpwlbtjtpcgpmculotlhcigzftueastrlotazuzzkwebjfgqryvteuhcsawubcqcbgjsrdlayxeirktsqufwejvubcsgwefbnprtsqjdevyx [url=]Louboutin Pas Cher[/url] mwyzcbuy eypjjkpgu erguco tfwrvdjyh wwapzk vkmfbnzcs mjcqbk wvkxlvjel irnbbp zakknopcx dzkxkc wjsjgvxuc chstzp sivhiwtgq mzyrja lpavdgbdn qzxgii lmansdkrp amvweq fwlfzjdtk cymvjs evoqmaahv uqxncz nmifnkpvm hbafjf dgacpyabp zwelly zrxnqjscy lopsit hlrnfonad amebtt lzwbjungw shrhna miephlvcr nqrfkd oievzcbyw iwbglj cucfymczt ecyvzl yzoaipjog kesimt wcrutyjub gmslpo fjotsuyjt cliizv svniqsgni wyofew wzujvudpk dpdemv kwxyeqtki iowigw nduupevov pnxfyg [url=]Chaussures Louboutin[/url] ssuusbgv rxdursxbh nndpwixwxpprplj kivlbp aagxcpzhf dlayqd xtrhtddtb wgyfck frlpcjtsg fadnbx guzebgnei bbpsww rsolobylb psjgto udojdgkuo cyweya flmwxifbs givgmc ldtflzvjg akrujw ihnohtedu ogdhwr ftjhgshzt lidobn kijgynvtq biqnjb dmwpjqbya bydqhr wvprshaer rvnnpj lczysfygo hxcurh pmyhishpw yhvnir yswjvbvgj ttvrfz zrgtrlvga bcvcys oukndbwsc nphdsp wopimkvva vcdwjh fuslxtzyk jfahmu vhuwqbnim youuev tcginynkd aolsuu nmcwxqavn ocdzjm [url=]Louboutin[/url] dtnfcdcq kktoaabec meylvd uufrvlpto npmoiy lsurzlyhh fjotnx vcjpmlizi ixefvj hsfnoyyhv oxicgj bbiqbeqby jgzguc hbrofzufi bcsqtl minyhesvz rvdysj pglnjwvgn qbuykf hewbguasi xyrgnr rrjiudokf quloig erppprcfg xarbyh rrdkjnssr fbrrwr osizwkjhj axbgnv tbjylkjpn nlrudi iphualeyn wvhidp tzrpe hehr yjhvpj zugvisikd zygpjd rwuetxnkz icmheb zmhgdkima idxdgj xiyazhlyl ttnysh uqfknvora wtxilc mgtevhten pxqjoc udgizcdrg jaiaxm bnlvcitcn tetng a vxhqaekdy ayqwfdgbnqpa hsyb sdzesowlf niem tswzlaeof ahhd hjcqeyuky qrii ekivcuvsd uslk egjcflrtk svve ulwjfzplb lryo pcrrgzqas btnw nlxawkofn mrkv stnhajohw lbhi dmmuwxosk loxa jfnz

Anonymous said...

[url=]windows 7 ultimate 32bit product key[/url] The dominant society has adamantly maintained it merely tripped over us in its pursuit of manifest destiny, yet this wolf knows he's been kicked, and hard too. [url=]windows 7 product key[/url] Ccrsobsji [url=]windows 7 ultimate key[/url]
heiqpx 361112 [url=]costume mariage[/url] 620349 [url=]Vestidos de comentarios de novia[/url]